IdeasWatch is temporarily in a  read-only mode  while we migrate the website to the new servers. Sorry for the inconvenience.
You are not signed in. Welcome to do everything anonymously, but to engage with other like-minded Ideators, please sign in:
Startup inspiration from the crowd

I would like to see on the market:

Please wait Lacking inspiration?

8

Popularity
Discussion
Similar projects
Cofounders


Recent activity in this startup idea

Anonymous added similar project 4 years ago
Michal Vlasák is watching this 7 years ago
Bryan Carl Chug is watching this 9 years ago
Karthick Selvaraj is watching this 10 years ago
Murtaza Halai added similar project 10 years ago
David Gonzales is watching this 10 years ago
Vincent Burg wants to realize this 10 years ago
Saul Fleischman started a discussion 10 years ago
Michael Puschmann is watching this 10 years ago
Vincent Burg shared this idea 10 years ago

Top ideators on IdeasWatch


Gmail Ganitor

a startup idea shared by Vincent Burg on 06/10/2012

Problem: massive amounts of email in Gmail (or other mail service) make it difficult to search. The number of old, irrelevant messages once archived but now completely useless clutter search results, returning hundreds of emails on each query. Solution: analyse the Gmail Archive folder based on sender, keywords, email length etc. The Ganitor then suggests email criteria for review, which are then mass deleted

archive

cleanup

delete

email

gmail

old

online ideas

search

DiscussionSimilar projects

Add a link to a similar project, latest article or a cool video related to this idea.

Title:

URL:

Type:

Note:

Team Cofounders

Get in touch with people passionate about realizing this idea. Show others how you can contribute (eg. webdesign, funding, media coverage, launch in your country).

Vincent Burg Functional design, Testing, Project coordination Travelling (Indonesia) at the moment)

I wanna do this!

My role:

My location:

Cancel

Discussion Discussions

What should be still thought out? Add a topic to start a discussion.

comments powered by Disqus